DO YOU BELIEVE IN FOLLOWING THE LAW ? MY DEMANDS FOR HEARINGS

0
406

You can’t have it both ways. No matter who you are. If you are one of those people who do not follow the laws of our land then it really won’t matter to you personally. But are you one of those people who refuse to follow the law when it is not in “your” best interest? Probably. Or at least that is the general rule of thumb. Or should I say that is the way most people want it. This is called trying to get away with anything that you can. This appears to be the cloth of what most attorney’s come from. Attorney’s write the laws of our land, after these laws are voted in, usually at State level and signed into law,  and then these same attorney’s lie their asses off, to try and twist these same laws to and for their own favor at the time that they are trying to win in court for their respected client.

This is why it is so hard to get any laws, to get passed into law in any State. Because people are trying to figure out all of the different ways that these same attorney’s can find the loop holes to getting their well paid clients off without enforcing these same laws.

But when you have attorney’s at the highest level at those State Offices, like our Attorney Generals Office. That lie their respected asses off, and only follow the law that they deem fit for themselves at that chosen time, just continues to bewilder me to no end. This is why I will have my day in court per say. I have instructed my attorney John Mansfield to file a Motion so that my case can be heard in open court for Sanctions against Daniel Snipes Johnson and M. Denise Stanford, at the Attorney Generals Office for lying under oath and allowing these people that they collectively represent to openly lie in pleadings after they have sworn to god that they will tell the truth.

With having said all of that, here you go you bunch of fraudsters.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO; 4:16-CV-20

RONALD LEONARD PIERCE   PLAINTIFF,   ANNE M. GARMON, ET AL.  DEFENDANTS.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR HEARING ON VERIFIED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS,  FED.R.CIV.P.26(G), & INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT

INTRODUCTION

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Ronald Leonard Pierce, through counsel, who hereby moves this Honorable Court to calendar a hearing on Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Sanctions Against Daniel Johnson and Denise Stanford. Said motion was filed 09/16/2016 (Doc. 84).

BASIS FOR MOTION

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 (I), undersigned counsel requests that the Court hear this motion, which seeks sanctions under the authority of Federal Rule 26 (g), and the inherent powers of the Court. Violations of Fed. R. Civ. 26 (g), that are not substantially justified, require a mandatory imposition of sanctions. A hearing of all pertinent parties identified in said motion, would be appropriate and fair, before ruling on that motion.

CONCLUSION

WHEREFOR, based on the foregoing, and all pertinent documents of record, Plaintiff requests that this matter be set on the Court’s calendar for hearing.

Dated: 11 October 2016

Respectfully submitted,

John D. Mansfield, Esq.

2840 Plaza Place, suite 260

Raleigh, NC. 27612

919-294-8032

Attorney for Plaintiff

 

Well there you have it. I refuse to, not stand up for the laws of this State, unlike the people of these State, that are paid to do this very thing. You can run, but you cannot hide forever.

 

LEAVE A REPLY